“Sing You Home” review

“Sing You Home” was the first of Jodi Picoult’s novels that I read. After hearing rave reviews about her other novels like “My Sister’s Keeper” I decided to give her one of her newer ones a go. I must say, I was very impressed with how easy it was to read, and how many facts she managed to intertwine into the story. Having said that, as my blog is called on the flip side, I think I have to comment on the flip side of this novel.

Picoult addresses many controversial issues such as gay rights and the church’s opinion on them, and I admire her for this. However, I must say that overall, she did not fairly explore the pros and cons of of each topic. While I absolutely support gay rights, I feel like the whole concept of the story was very bias towards them. She didn’t put the church in a positive light, and I can understand how this would offend some readers. What Picoult failed to address was that even in our time, some people are less open minded and more orthodox. These people do not support gay rights, whatever their reasons may be. I think she didn’t respect their opinion enough, and painted their characters in such a negative way. In all fairness to both parties, there was no “right or wrong” person to get the embryos, but Picoult wrote the entire argument in such a way that only the church could be wrong for disagreeing with modern day practices. This is hypocritical- if the whole point of the novel is to respect people for who they are, then why was she not respectful of the church’s opinion? There are people who follow religious teachings, but are not extremists. Had she added some characters like this, the novel would have had more depth.

Overall, this is a great feel good read;it sends an encouraging “don’t give up” message. If you haven’t already read it,I highly recommend you do and form your own opinion.

Advertisements

2 thoughts on ““Sing You Home” review

  1. Have to say how pleased I am to find someone feels the same way about this book as me. As much as I fully support people having the right to fall in love with whoever they choose I found it incredibly infuriating that Zoe demanded respect for her views and opinions, yet did not give that same respect to others e.g. with the ‘Happy Birthday Baby Jesus’ on the cake. ‘What if Sammy decided she wanted to be a Christian?’ I wonder. I didn’t think Christians were represented very fairly: they all seemed like ‘the placard waving villians’ when, the fact is, some Christians fully supportive of gay rights. I had a similar problem with Picoult’s one sidedness when I read ‘Nineteen Minutes’ (the one about a high-school shooting). I don’t know if you’ve read that one but I wrote a post ‘Nineteen Words for Grace’ about how I felt some characters in there were unfairly two-dimensional. Maybe you could have a look.
    x

    • Thank you for your comment! I have not read Nineteen Minutes yet – I plan on reading My Sister’s Keeper next, just to see what all the hype is about! xx

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s